“We can not solve today's problems at the same level of thought we
were at when we created them”
Albert Einstein
Most of what we are attempting “fix” today were solutions to past
problems. This should be insight to what is to come - today's solutions will
be tomorrow's problems.
Teetering on master of the obvious, good intentions and best hopes seldom
solve problems. More often or not, our solutions like those implemented before fail
to resolve or solve completely the problem.
I believe it is more or less due to a critical missed opportunity.
That is, the understanding and practice of root cause analysis.
Akin to treating the common cold, we use different strategies to
address the symptoms of a cold.
Actually, our body reacts to any number of viruses (some estimate over a
200) creating a set of symptoms we commonly refer to as a cold.
According to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, scientists can identify the cause of a large percentage of colds but
there remain somewhere between 20 to 30 percent unidentified. They are hopeful that technology will assist
in getting the “causes” identified in the next 10 years.
Treating the symptoms of a cold is not addressing the virus. We merely treat any number of symptoms hoping
to feel better. Scientists are hopeful
that there may in fact be a vaccine in the future to prevent the spread of cold
producing viruses.
The good news is that unlike the cold, organizations can in fact not
only identify the root cause of a problem but can take steps to adjust,
correct, and prevent future problems.
I’ve learned that it's not that we don't want to get to the
"root" of a problem. We either don't invest the time, energy,
or effort, or, we don't know how.
Nonetheless, getting to root cause is extremely important to a learning
organization.
There are several proven tools and strategies with respect to root
cause analysis. Leaders must select one
that best meets the culture, context, and capacity of their organization.
I want to suggest that root cause analysis is not just for
identifying the cause of a problem. It
can be used as a tool to identify "what" we stop doing.
In rereading Permission to
Forget by Lee Jenkins, I was reminded of a powerful concept - one that I
need to get better at - "add one subtract two" Simply, before adding
an initiative, change, policy or etc. effective leaders carefully examine their
organization to identify at least two programs, practices, or the like to
abandon or eliminate. Root cause analysis can assist especially in the
area of initiative overload.
Determining program efficiency and effectiveness goes beyond
identification of root cause. Bill
Daggett introduced the efficiency/effectiveness matrix several years. The
application of the matrix is most powerful when you require the use of actual
data to determine where you place a program or practice with respect to
efficiency (cost) and effectiveness (performance).
The utility and import of the matrix is found in the depth of data
used to determine efficiency and effectiveness. You must use both
qualitative and quantitative data points. What you can't use or at least
depend upon is anecdotal accounts or evidence of cost and results. Though
tempting to rush this, you have to drill down to actual cost and actual
performance results.
If we utilize both root cause analysis and the
efficiency/effectiveness matrix we can make better decisions today especially
in addressing “yesterday’s” solutions – our current problems.
I am confident that
we can reduce the likelihood of future leaders looking at our decisions or
solutions as problems if we invest in both root cause analysis and the
efficiency/effectiveness matrix on a continuous basis.
No comments:
Post a Comment